Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 64 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Multiparty Communication Complexity of Disjointness (0801.3624v3)

Published 23 Jan 2008 in cs.CC

Abstract: We obtain a lower bound of nOmega(1) on the k-party randomized communication complexity of the Disjointness function in the `Number on the Forehead' model of multiparty communication when k is a constant. For k=o(loglog n), the bounds remain super-polylogarithmic i.e. (log n)omega(1). The previous best lower bound for three players until recently was Omega(log n). Our bound separates the communication complexity classes NP{CC}_k and BPP{CC}_k for k=o(loglog n). Furthermore, by the results of Beame, Pitassi and Segerlind \cite{BPS07}, our bound implies proof size lower bounds for tree-like, degree k-1 threshold systems and superpolynomial size lower bounds for Lovasz-Schrijver proofs. Sherstov \cite{She07b} recently developed a novel technique to obtain lower bounds on two-party communication using the approximate polynomial degree of boolean functions. We obtain our results by extending his technique to the multi-party setting using ideas from Chattopadhyay \cite{Cha07}. A similar bound for Disjointness has been recently and independently obtained by Lee and Shraibman.

Citations (83)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.